Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:41
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What are the ethical implications of using AI in recruitment and hiring processes?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Democrats be honest, how many of you were wishing that Musk rescue space flight blew up?
Russia can stop this any time.
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Flyers getting high marks from experts for 2025 NHL Draft - Broad Street Hockey
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
If there is an abandoned house with no owner, can I live in it?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.